Material used:
·
Black
+ White sticky paper(A3)
·
Scalpel
·
Cutting
mat
·
A3
(tracing paper, black + white paper, plain paper)
·
Magazine
of city scape
·
Drawings
of city scape (observation, perspective)
Techniques:
·
The
cityscapes are from magazines and observational drawings.
·
Gather
and compose the drawings on the A3 tracing paper.
·
Simplify
the drawings, so it is easier to cut out and it would look less messy.
·
When
drawing the buildings, you should add bridges so the black sticky paper won’t
fall out.
·
On
the tracing paper, shade in the section that are meant to be white(this is the
part you are going to cut out)
·
Stick
the black sticky paper on top of the white sticky paper.
·
Use
the sticky tape to stick the paper (photocopied from the tracing paper) on top
of the black + white sticky paper.
·
They
should all be in A3 size.
·
Use
the scalpel to cut through the photocopied paper and also through the black
sticky paper.
·
You
should not cut through the white sticky paper that was underneath the black
sticky paper.
·
When
using the scalpel, don’t put too much pressure on the paper. (This would damage
the white paper underneath.)
·
Any
loose black sticky paper should be glued in.
·
When
you finish cutting out the white parts, mount it on white paper.
·
Mounting
(Stick the finished city scape on top of the white paper. The white border
around the paper should be all the same length.)
Evaluation
Subject
Matter
What
inspired me were the cityscapes and the landscapes.
The
technique I used for the work is from Kara walker-cutting of black and white
paper, but the buildings
Itself
was influenced by architects like Frank Gehry or Ludwid Mies van der Rohe.
Techniques
One
of the techniques I used was to simplify the buildings. I want the audience to clearly
see the composition and more importantly so the final art work won’t look like
a mess.
I
learnt that cut outs are not always flat and boring. Composition is very
important.
The
composition could make the buildings stand out even without complimentary
colours.
I’m
satisfied with my work, but if I can produce it again I would modify the
background to be more perspective mainly because it looks really flat.
Flat
background is mainly what I would want, but in this case the main colour is black
and white, the objects are quite plain. To make the background be less plain,
add some shadow lines.
When
I was working, sometimes the part that I cut out doesn’t look right at the end
result.
What
I did wrong was that the cityscape didn’t look full.
When
I look at it, it feels like there was something missing. I spotted that something
was missing when I looked at it from far away. There was a big gap between the
buildings.
Next
time...Before I decide what parts should be black or white, I would stop and look
at the shaded parts and look at it from a distant.
I
would be able to spot the big gap between the buildings.
Kara
works on negative and positive points by cut outs. She creates illusion well,
but I don’t think I applied what she did as much, as in what is in the
background or what is in the fore ground.
This
is an eye level view. The composition is not random. I used a mixture of curvy
lines and dramatic strict vertical shapes/lines to give that strong look, Just
as strong as the buildings itself.
Review
My
idea changed in a couple of ways: I have added some shadow lines, I simplified
the windows on the buildings and I also placed a building behind another to
create an illusion of the objects as if there in front of another or behind.
This is a great evaluation!
ReplyDelete